The Visibility Index
Boards: Business insuranceCar insuranceHome insuranceNear-me and map packSpecialty commercial · United StatesCanadaInteractive map
Home / The Index / United States / Washington / specialty
Car insurance Home insurance Business insurance Same geography, three lines
WA
Insurance board · November 2026

Washington

United States
Searches tracked
19
AI Overview rate
78.9%
Sources per answer
4.5
Locator United States

Insurance in Washington: who ranks, and who gets cited

Progressive Commercial leads both the organic results and the AI citations in Washington, which is unusual: it is the less common of the two outcomes. An AI Overview appeared on 78.9% of the 19 searches tracked here, citing an average of 4.5 sources.

Discipline 01 · Best insurance SEO Progressive Commercial Organic visibility 100 / 100
Discipline 02 · Best insurance GEO Progressive Commercial Cited in 36% of carrier citations
Discipline 03 · Best local SEO Affordable Insurance 10.2% of map slots across 3 metros

Organic visibility

Indexed to the Washington leader
Organic visibility by carrier in Washington, specialty insurance, November 2026
#CarrierVisibility index
01 Progressive Commercial 100
02 NEXT Insurance 47.6
03 GEICO 28.5
04 Sentry Insurance 18.2
05 The Hartford 18.2
06 Insurance for Nonprofits 15.9
07 Travelers 3.6
08 Merchants Insurance Group 2.6
09 Nationwide 2.3

AI citation share

Share of carrier citations
Share of AI Overview citations by carrier in Washington, specialty insurance, November 2026
#CarrierShare of carrier citations
01 Progressive Commercial 36%
02 Insurance for Nonprofits 20%
03 GEICO 16%
04 NEXT Insurance 12%
05 The Hartford 12%
06 Farmers 4%

Who Google cites

All sources, not only carriers
Types of source cited in AI Overviews in Washington, specialty insurance, November 2026
#Source typeShare of citations
01 carrier 37.3%
02 aggregator 13.4%
03 unknown 10.4%
04 agency 9%
05 publisher 9%
06 forum 7.5%
07 association 4.5%
08 software 4.5%
09 directory 1.5%
10 search 1.5%
11 social 1.5%

Named in the answer

Mentions, not citations
Carriers named in AI Overview text in Washington, specialty insurance, November 2026
#CarrierShare of mentions
01 GEICO 25%
02 Progressive 21.4%
03 Progressive Commercial 21.4%
04 NEXT Insurance 14.3%
05 The Hartford 10.7%
06 Farmers 7.1%

Being described in the answer and being cited as a source are different things.

What these searches return

By intent, 19 searches
AI Overview presence by search intent in Washington, November 2026
Search intentReturned an AI Overview
unclassified 78.9%
Washington · Auto · 19 captures · Jul 2026

Not on these boards?

Public boards list national carriers and aggregate the rest. We will run your brand against this exact query set in Washington and send you all three scores.

Get your Washington scorecard
Free · 2-day turnaround · no call required

Local pack by metro

3 metros measured in Washington
Local pack leader in each Washington metro, November 2026
#MetroLeading business Share of slotsBusinessesRating
01 Seattle Seattle Car Insurance Pros 13.9% 14 —
02 Spokane Affordable Insurance 30.6% 9 5
03 Tacoma Sound Pacific Insurance 30.6% 11 5

Near-me searches are measured per metro, not per state. Each metro has its own board.

Every source the AI cites

40 domains · not only insurers

The citation table above lists insurers only. This one lists everything the answer actually pointed at, which is a different picture: in Washington, insurers are 37.3% of cited sources and comparison sites are 13.4%.

Every domain cited in AI answers for Washington, November 2026
#SourceType Share of citations
01 Progressive Commercial
progressivecommercial.com
Insurers
13.4%
02 Insurance for Nonprofits
insurancefornonprofits.org
Insurers
7.5%
03 YouTube
youtube.com
Forums
7.5%
04 GEICO
geico.com
Insurers
6%
05 NerdWallet
nerdwallet.com
Comparison sites
4.5%
06 NEXT Insurance
nextinsurance.com
Insurers
4.5%
07 The Hartford
thehartford.com
Insurers
4.5%
08 Associated Hair Professionals
associatedhairprofessionals.com
Associations
1.5%
09 AutoGuide
autoguide.com
Publishers
1.5%
10 bowmansinsurance.com
bowmansinsurance.com
unknown
1.5%
11 Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Publishers
1.5%
12 Farmer Brown Insurance
farmerbrown.com
Agencies
1.5%
13 Farmers
farmers.com
Insurers
1.5%
14 FreightWaves
freightwaves.com
Publishers
1.5%
15 Gallagher Small Business
gallaghersmallbusiness.com
Agencies
1.5%
16 Geotab
geotab.com
software
1.5%
17 Google
google.com
Search
1.5%
18 Gym Insurance
gyminsurance.com
Comparison sites
1.5%
19 iatinsurancegroup.com
iatinsurancegroup.com
unknown
1.5%
20 idahoinsuranceforless.com
idahoinsuranceforless.com
unknown
1.5%
21 Insure Bodywork
insurebodywork.com
Comparison sites
1.5%
22 LeadIQ
leadiq.com
software
1.5%
23 Leavitt Group
leavitt.com
Agencies
1.5%
24 LinkedIn
linkedin.com
Social
1.5%
25 Yelp
m.yelp.com
Directories
1.5%
26 MoneyGeek
moneygeek.com
Comparison sites
1.5%
27 northtowninsurance.com
northtowninsurance.com
unknown
1.5%
28 New York Council of Nonprofits
nycon.org
Associations
1.5%
29 pnwinsurancegroup.com
pnwinsurancegroup.com
unknown
1.5%
30 risman.com
risman.com
unknown
1.5%
31 ServiceTitan
servicetitan.com
software
1.5%
32 Simply Business
simplybusiness.com
Comparison sites
1.5%
33 SoFi
sofi.com
Publishers
1.5%
34 BFIS
thebfis.com
Agencies
1.5%
35 The Zebra
thezebra.com
Comparison sites
1.5%
36 Truck Info
truckinfo.net
Publishers
1.5%
37 TruckLeap
truckleap.com
Comparison sites
1.5%
38 Truckwriters
truckwriters.com
Agencies
1.5%
39 trustedcare.com
trustedcare.com
unknown
1.5%
40 Turf Magazine
turfmagazine.com
Publishers
1.5%

Types are assigned from a published list. A source we cannot classify with confidence is left unclassified rather than guessed at.

Where this board sits

Every board is free and public

What is on this page position-weighted organic visibility indexed to the Washington leader, share of sources cited in AI Overviews, share of answers naming a carrier, and Local Pack presence. The first three use the same 19 searches captured November 2026. Local Pack comes from a separate set of near-me searches measured per metro, joined here.

Never combined the disciplines are reported separately and are not summed. A blended score would hide the only finding that matters, which is where they disagree.

Coverage Google AI Overviews only. ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude are separate surfaces and are not measured.